
Metal 3D Printer Selection Begins with the End in Mind
By Pete Basiliere - Founder, Monadnock Insights The choice of 3D printing technology, whether using plastics, composites, or metals, begins with the end in mind. The items you want determines their material, which determines the best technology for printing the part. From there, choose the 3D printer provider that offers the technology and printer models that are appropriate for your application.
For example, let's say that you want to make aluminum load-bearing brackets that are components of a larger device. Your supply chain logistics staff dictate a quick turnaround, while a low total cost is required for adequate profit margins. On the surface, five 3D printing technologies offer the means for producing that bracket: binder jetting, directed energy deposition, powder bed fusion, sheet lamination, and liquid metal. However, the part requires a blend of availability, cost, material, and performance characteristics. That leaves two options: powder bed fusion and liquid metal.
Comparing the two technologies will determine which is most appropriate for use and, therefore, which vendor to consider. The initial evaluation should focus on three areas: quality, total cost of ownership, and staff skillset.

ElemX 3D Liquid Metal printed drive hub
Evaluate metal 3D printers based on their ability to replicate parts with the same quality as the original component. You, and your customers, have certain expectations regarding the fit, finish, and use of your parts, whether for one order or multiple orders placed over time.
Quality
Characteristic |
Powder Bed Fusion |
Liquid Metal |
Accuracy: Ability to precisely print as designed |
Layer thickness: 0.025 - 0.06 mm Wall thickness: 1.0 - 10 mm Density: >99.0% Dimensional tolerance (without post-processing): <0.1 mm to 0.3 mm |
Layer thickness: 0.24 mm minimum Wall thickness: 3 mm Density: >98.5% Dimensional tolerance (without post-processing): <0.5 mm to > 0.6 mm |
Strength: Performance of finished parts compared to internal and external standards |
Comparable to cast parts; high strength aluminum cracks; may be brittle with low elongation; heat treatments improve strength |
Material properties as good or better than input material |
Finish: Average roughness |
Surface texture after printing: Ra values from 4.5 - 20 μm |
The Surface roughness for our process after printing is 28 μm +-5μm |

ElemX 3D Liquid Metal printed docking socket
A new machine's total capital cost depends as much on whether similar systems are in place as it does on the purchase price. Expanding a current facility, especially one with space set aside for the 3D printer, is much less expensive than retrofitting a structure or constructing a new building. Similarly, a new machine's operating cost may involve unanticipated expenditures ranging from protective gear (gloves and glasses) to high-end personal protective equipment, with breathing apparatus to specially stored and carefully used gasses.
Total Cost of Operation
Characteristic |
Powder Bed Fusion |
Liquid Metal |
3D printer capital cost - Investment cost for printer and auxiliary equipment |
$100,000 to greater than $1 million; average of $467,635[1]; additional cost for sintering furnace |
Equivalent to mid-range PBF Cost includes printer, chiller, slicer software, build plate removal tool, and initial supplies kit |
Facility capital cost - Investment cost for facility build or retrofit and safety systems |
May exceed the cost of the 3D printer based on structure costs and equipment for safe material handling of gasses and reactive Al alloy powders[2] $1 million + |
Basic safety measures around heat and the argon gas used in the printhead area Utilizes basic shop infrastructure such as compressed air and 480v power source
|
Production speed - Process time for 125 mm (5 inch) cube |
Varies with build size, scanning scheme, laser power and beam size, and the number of lasers; Process time for 125 mm (5 inch) cube: 0.5 - 3 days[3] |
Varies with part; up to 0.5 pounds per hour max build rate |
Material cost - Purchase price for materials used to 3D print the part, including production and post-processing waste |
Material cost includes powder used by the item, support materials, powder loss during cleaning, and build plate used in printing; Metal powders range up to $250/kilogram[4] |
Commercial off-the-shelf A356 (Al4008) aluminum alloy; cost includes support materials but no powder removal or build plate; aluminum wire ranges up to $70/kg |
Post-processing cost - Expense for auxiliary activities |
Process gas cost, support trimming, build plate must be cut away, sintering |
Support trimming; build plate removal without cutting; no sintering |
Just as a new driver does not buy a new car before learning to drive, ensure that you have the in-house skills necessary to implement metal 3D printing. No doubt you have designers and operators who will jump at the chance to participate in an exciting new technology and product offering. However, the learning curve for Powder Bed Fusion is very steep compared to liquid metal 3D printing and must factor into your evaluation. Fortunately, various universities, trade organizations, and technology providers offer training courses for designers and operators.
Skillset
Characteristic |
Powder Bed Fusion |
Liquid Metal |
Designers - Engineers or CAD specialists who create the digital models to be 3D printed |
Requires an understanding of PBF design guidelines, especially the need for external, accessible supports and ensuring powder removal from hollow areas |
Requires an understanding of LM design guidelines, especially orientation of the part on its build plate |
Operators - Personnel who run the 3D printer and support staff |
Must recognize PBF parameters and the influence of adjustments on the as-built part, including the interaction of the process heat source with the feedstock, and problems associated with inadequate preparation and setup of the build platform, handling and storage of feedstock, and application of the gases[5] |
Must recognize LM parameters and the influence of adjustments to the printhead and feed rate on the built part, and handling of raw materials |
Beginning with the end in mind is key to successful 3D printing of aluminum and any other material. Assess your requirements and weigh the relative merits of the different technologies from a quality, total cost of ownership, and skillset perspective before you buy.

Pete Basiliere provides research-based insights on 3D printing and digital-printing hardware, software and materials, best practices, go-to-market strategies and technology trends. Before founding Monadnock Insights, Pete spent eleven years as Gartner’s Research Vice President – Additive Manufacturing. Pete’s full bio can be found here.

On-Demand Manufacturing. Simpler. Safer. Stronger.
We're leading the way in additive manufacturing innovation using polymer and metal 3D printing technologies to introduce new equipment, materials and tools that enable production of complex parts fast.
Related Articles
Xerox Named a Sustainability Leader in the Print Industry by Quocirca
Quocirca, a leading source for independent research, thought leadership, and actionable insight for the print industry, has named Xerox a sustainability leader in its Sustainability Trends 2022 report.
Xerox Innovative Products & Services Awards
Discover Xerox industry leading products & services, with awards like the Pacesetter and Keypoint Intelligence – Buyers Lab given for their innovative solutions.
What is Additive Manufacturing?
What exactly is 3D printing? It’s the process of printing by adding multiple layers upon each other, rather than printing a single layer of ink.
How Xerox Turned Printer Filters into Face Masks
When the call went out at Xerox to think about new ways to use materials on hand to help the coronavirus humanitarian effort, Mark Adiletta, long-time Xerox engineering manager, had a crazy thought: What if we use printer filters to make medical-grade fac
Xerox Accessibility Policy
Xerox is committed to ensuring that our website is accessible to everyone. View our web accessibility policy here.
Corporate Knights' List of Most Sustainable Corporations
Corporate Knights recognised Xerox among most sustainable corporations. Learn more about why our sustainability goals and net-zero roadmap put Xerox ahead of nearly 7,000 other companies on the list.