Capital Resources and Liquidity
Cash Flow Analysis
The following summarizes our cash flows for the three years ended December 31, 2009, as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements:
| Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 2,208 | $ | 939 | $ | 1,871 | $ | 1,269 | $ | (932 | ) | |||||||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
(343 | ) | (441 | ) | (1,612 | ) | 98 | 1,171 | ||||||||||||
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
692 | (311 | ) | (619 | ) | 1,003 | 308 | |||||||||||||
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
13 | (57 | ) | 60 | 70 | (117 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
2,570 | 130 | (300 | ) | 2,440 | 430 | ||||||||||||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
1,229 | 1,099 | 1,399 | 130 | (300 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year |
$ | 3,799 | $ | 1,229 | $ | 1,099 | $ | 2,570 | $ | 130 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $2,208 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The $1,269 million increase from 2008 was primarily due to the following:
- $587 million increase due to the absence of payments for securities-related litigation settlements.
- $433 million increase as a result of lower inventory levels reflecting aggressive supply chain actions in light of lower sales volume.
- $410 million increase from accounts receivables reflecting the benefits from sales of accounts receivables, lower revenue and strong collection effectiveness.
- $177 million increase due to lower contributions to our defined pension benefit plans. The lower contributions are primarily in the U.S., as no contributions were required due to the availability of prior years’ credit balances.
- $116 million increase due to lower net tax payments.
- $84 million increase due to higher net run-off of finance receivables.
- $64 million increase due to lower placements of equipment on operating leases, reflecting lower install activity.
- $440 million decrease in pre-tax income before litigation, restructuring and acquisition costs.
- $139 million decrease due to higher restructuring payments related to prior years’ actions.
- $54 million decrease due to lower accounts payable and accrued compensation, primarily related to lower purchases and the timing of payments to suppliers.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $939 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The $932 million decrease from 2007 was primarily due to the following:
- $615 million decrease due to net payments for the settlement of the securities-related litigation.
- $330 million decrease in pre-tax income before litigation and restructuring.
- $90 million decrease due to higher net income tax payments, primarily resulting from the absence of prior-year tax refunds.
- $74 million decrease primarily due to lower benefit and compensation accruals.
- $71 million decrease due to higher inventory levels as a result of lower equipment and supplies sales in 2008.
- $136 million increase from accounts receivable due to strong collection effectiveness throughout 2008.
- $107 million increase from derivatives, primarily due to the termination of certain interest rate swaps in fourth quarter 2008.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $343 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The $98 million increase from 2008 was primarily due to the following:
- $142 million increase due to lower capital expenditures (including internal use software), reflecting very stringent spending controls.
- $21 million decrease due to lower cash proceeds from asset sales.
Net cash used in investing activities was $441 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The $1,171 million increase from 2007 was primarily due to the following:
- $1,460 million increase due to less cash used for acquisitions. 2008 acquisitions included $138 million for Veenman B.V. and Saxon Business Systems, as compared to $1,568 million for GIS and its additional acquisitions in the prior year.
- $192 million decrease due to lower funds from escrow and other restricted investments in 2008. The prior year reflected funds received from the run-off of our secured borrowing programs.
- $134 million decrease in other investing cash flows due to the absence of proceeds from liquidations of short-term investments.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $692 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The $1,003 million increase from 2008 was primarily due to the following:
- $812 million increase because no purchases were made under our share repurchase program during 2009.
- $170 million increase from lower net repayments on secured debt.
- $21 million increase due to lower share repurchases related to employee withholding taxes on stock-based compensation vesting.
- $3 million decrease due to lower net debt proceeds. 2009 reflects the repayment of $1,029 million for Senior Notes due in 2009, net payments of $448 million for Zero Coupon Notes, net payments of $246 million on the Credit Facility, net payments of $35 million primarily for foreign short-term borrowings and $44 million of debt issuance costs for the Bridge Loan Facility commitment, which was recently terminated. These payments were partially offset by net proceeds of $2,725 million from the issuance of Senior Notes in May and December 2009. 2008 reflects the issuance of $1.4 billion in Senior Notes, $250 million in Zero Coupon Notes and net payments of $354 million on the Credit Facility and $370 million on other debt.
Net cash used in financing activities was $311 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. The $308 million increase from 2007 was primarily due to the following:
- $1,642 million increase from lower net repayments on secured debt. 2007 reflects termination of our secured financing programs with GE in the United Kingdom and Canada of $634 million and Merrill Lynch in France for $469 million, as well as the repayment of secured borrowings to DLL of $153 million. The remainder reflects lower payments associated with our GE U.S. secured borrowings.
- $888 million decrease from lower net cash proceeds from unsecured debt. 2008 reflects the issuance of $1.4 billion in Senior Notes, $250 million from a private placement borrowing and net payments of $354 million on the Credit Facility, and $370 million on other debt. 2007 reflects the issuance of $1.1 billion Senior Notes, $400 million from private placement borrowings and net proceeds of $600 million on the Credit Facility, offset by net payments of $286 million on other debt.
- $180 million decrease due to additional purchases under our share repurchase program.
- $154 million decrease due to common stock dividend payments.
- $79 million decrease due to lower proceeds from the issuance of common stock, reflecting a decrease in stock option exercises as well as lower related tax benefits.
- $33 million decrease due to share repurchases related to employee withholding taxes on stock-based compensation vesting.
Financing Activities, Credit Facility and Capital Markets
Customer Financing Activities
We provide lease equipment financing to the majority of our customers. Our lease contracts permit customers to pay for equipment over time rather than at the date of installation. Our investment in these contracts is reflected in Total finance assets, net. We currently fund our customer financing activity through cash generated from operations, cash on hand, borrowings under bank credit facilities and proceeds from capital markets offerings.
We have arrangements in certain international countries and domestically through GIS, where third-party financial institutions independently provide lease financing, on a non-recourse basis to Xerox, directly to our customers. In these arrangements, we sell and transfer title of the equipment to these financial institutions. Generally, we have no continuing ownership rights in the equipment subsequent to its sale; therefore, the unrelated third-party finance receivable and debt are not included in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following represents Total finance assets associated with our lease and finance operations as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
(in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | ||||
|
Total finance receivables, net(1) |
$ | 7,027 | $ | 7,278 | ||
|
Equipment on operating leases, net |
551 | 594 | ||||
|
Total Finance Assets, Net |
$ | 7,578 | $ | 7,872 | ||
(1) Includes (i) billed portion of finance receivables, net, (ii) finance receivables, net and (iii) finance receivables due after one year, net as included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The decrease of $294 million in Total finance assets, net includes favorable currency of $224 million.
We maintain a certain level of debt, referred to as financing debt, in order to support our investment in our lease contracts. We maintain an assumed 7:1 leverage ratio of debt to equity as compared to our finance assets for this financing aspect of our business. Based on this leverage, the following represents the breakdown of Total debt between financing debt and core debt as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
(in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | ||||
|
Financing debt(1) |
$ | 6,631 | $ | 6,888 | ||
|
Core debt(2) |
2,633 | 1,496 | ||||
|
Total Debt |
$ | 9,264 | $ | 8,384 | ||
(1) Financing debt includes $6,149 million and $6,368 million as of December 2009 and 2008, respectively, of debt associated with Total finance receivables, net and is the basis for our calculation of “equipment financing interest” expense. The remainder of the financing debt is associated with Equipment on operating leases.
(2) Core debt at December 31, 2009 includes the $2.0 billion Senior Notes issuance which was used to fund the acquisition of ACS.
The following summarizes our debt as of December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
(in millions) |
2009 | 2008 | ||||||
|
Principal debt balance(3) |
$ | 9,122 | $ | 8,201 | ||||
|
Net unamortized discount |
(11 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
|
Fair value adjustments |
153 | 189 | ||||||
|
Total Debt(3) |
9,264 | 8,384 | ||||||
|
Less: Current maturities and short-term debt |
(988 | ) | (1,610 | ) | ||||
|
Total Long-term Debt(3) |
$ | 8,276 | $ | 6,774 | ||||
(3) Total debt at December 31, 2009 includes the $2.0 billion Senior Notes issuance which was used to fund the acquisition of ACS.
Principal debt balance at December 31, 2008 includes short-term debt of $61 million. Refer to Note 11 – Debt in the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the above balances.
Financial Instruments
Refer to Note 13 – Financial Instruments in the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our derivative financial instruments.
Share Repurchase Programs
Refer to Note 17 – Shareholders’ Equity – “Treasury Stock” in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding our share repurchase programs.Dividends
The Board of Directors declared a 4.25 cent per-share dividend on common stock in each quarter of 2009 and 2008.
Credit Facility
In October 2009, in connection with our anticipated acquisition of ACS, we amended our $2.0 billion Credit Facility and entered into a Bridge Loan Facility commitment as noted below. The Credit Facility amendment extended the maximum permitted leverage ratio of 4.25x through September 30, 2010, which will change to 4.00x through December 31, 2010 and to 3.75x thereafter. The amendment also included the following changes:
- The definition of principal debt was changed such that principal debt was calculated as of December 31, 2009 net of cash proceeds from the Senior Notes issued in connection with the pre-funding of the ACS acquisition.
- A portion of the Credit Facility that had a maturity date of April 30, 2012 was extended to a maturity date of April 30, 2013, consistent with the majority of the facility. Accordingly, after this amendment, approximately $1.6 billion, or approximately 80% of the Credit Facility, has a maturity date of April 30, 2013.
Capital Markets Offerings
In 2009 we raised net proceeds of $745 million and $1,980 million through the issuance of Senior Notes of $750 million in May and $2.0 billion in December, respectively. The net proceeds from the Senior Notes issued in December 2009 were used to fund the acquisition of ACS.
Refer to Note 3 – Acquisitions in the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding the ACS acquisition, as well as Note 11 – Debt in the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Debt activity.
Bridge Loan Facility Commitment
In connection with the agreement to acquire ACS, in September 2009 we entered into a commitment for a syndicated $3.0 billion Bridge Loan Facility with several banks that was to be used for funding the acquisition in the event the transaction closed prior to obtaining permanent financing in the capital markets. Debt issuance costs for the Bridge Loan Facility commitment were $58 million. On December 4, 2009, the debt commitment was reduced to $500 million following our issuance of $2.0 billion of Senior Notes. On January 8, 2010, we terminated the remaining commitment because we concluded we had sufficient liquidity to complete the ACS acquisition without having to borrow under the Bridge Loan Facility.
Liquidity and Financial Flexibility
We manage our worldwide liquidity using internal cash management practices, which are subject to (1) the statutes, regulations and practices of each of the local jurisdictions in which we operate, (2) the legal requirements of the agreements to which we are a party and (3) the policies and cooperation of the financial institutions we utilize to maintain and provide cash management services.
Our liquidity is a function of our ability to successfully generate cash flows from a combination of efficient operations and access to capital markets. Our ability to maintain positive liquidity going forward depends on our ability to continue to generate cash from operations and access to financial markets, both of which are subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other market factors that are beyond our control.
The following is a discussion of our liquidity position as of December 31, 2009:
- As of December 31, 2009, total cash and cash equivalents was $3.8 billion and our borrowing capacity under our Credit Facility was $2.0 billion, reflecting no outstanding borrowings or letters of credit. Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 included the net proceeds from the $2.0 billion Senior Notes issued in December 2009, which were used to fund the acquisition of ACS.
- Over the past three years we have consistently delivered strong cash flow from operations, driven by the strength of our annuity-based revenue model. Cash flows from operations were $2,208 million, $939 million and $1,871 million for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Cash flows from operations in 2008 included $615 million in net payments for our securities litigation.
- Our principal debt maturities are in line with historical and projected cash flows and are spread over the next 10 years as follows (in millions):
| Year | Amount | ||
|
2010 |
$ | 988 | |
|
2011 |
802 | ||
|
2012 |
1,101 | ||
|
2013 |
961 | ||
|
2014 |
819 | ||
|
2015 |
1,000 | ||
|
2016 |
950 | ||
|
2017 |
500 | ||
|
2018 |
1,001 | ||
|
2019 and thereafter |
1,000 | ||
|
Total |
$ | 9,122 | |
In February 2010, in connection with the closing of our acquisition of ACS, we borrowed $649 million under our Credit Facility.
Loan Covenants and Compliance
At December 31, 2009 we were in full compliance with the covenants and other provisions of the Credit Facility, our Senior Notes and our Bridge Loan Facility commitment (which was terminated on January 8, 2010). We have the right to prepay any outstanding loans or to terminate the Credit Facility without penalty. Failure to be in compliance with any material provision or covenant of these agreements could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operations and our ability to continue to fund our customers’ purchase of Xerox equipment.
Refer to Note 11 – Debt for further information regarding debt arrangements.
Credit Ratings: We are currently rated investment grade by all major rating agencies. As of February 8, 2010 the ratings were as follows:
| Senior Unsecured Debt | Outlook | |||
|
Moody’s |
Baa2 | Stable | ||
|
Standard & Poors |
BBB– | Stable | ||
|
Fitch |
BBB | Negative |
Contractual Cash Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments and Contingencies
At December 31, 2009 we had the following contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments and contingencies (in millions):
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||
|
Long-term debt, including capital lease obligations(1) |
$ | 988 | $ | 802 | $ | 1,101 | $ | 961 | $ | 819 | $ 4,451 | |||||||
|
Minimum operating lease commitments(2) |
224 | 181 | 128 | 99 | 70 | 80 | ||||||||||||
|
Liability to subsidiary trust issuing preferred securities(3) |
— | — | — | — | — | 649 | ||||||||||||
|
Retiree health payments |
103 | 101 | 100 | 100 | 98 | 457 | ||||||||||||
|
Purchase commitments |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Flextronics(4) |
503 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Fuji Xerox(5) |
1,256 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
EDS contracts(6) |
113 | 77 | 77 | 77 | 19 | — | ||||||||||||
|
Other IM service contracts(7) |
80 | 77 | 61 | 56 | 44 | 18 | ||||||||||||
|
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
$ | 3,267 | $ | 1,238 | $ | 1,467 | $ | 1,293 | $ | 1,050 | $ 5,655 | |||||||
(1) Refer to Note 11 – Debt in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information and interest payments related to long-term debt (amounts above include principal portion only).
(2) Refer to Note 6 – Land, Buildings and Equipment, Net in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to minimum operating lease commitments.
(3) Refer to Note 12 – Liability to Subsidiary Trust Issuing Preferred Securities in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information and interest payments (amounts above include principal portion only).
(4) Flextronics: We outsource certain manufacturing activities to Flextronics and are currently in the third year of the Master Supply Agreement. The term of this agreement is three years, with two additional one-year extension periods at our option. The amount included in the table reflects our estimate of purchases over the next year and is not a contractual commitment.
(5) Fuji Xerox: The amount included in the table reflects our estimate of purchases over the next year and is not a contractual commitment.
(6) EDS contract: We have an information management contract with Electronic Data Systems Corp. (“EDS”) through March 2014. Services to be provided under this contract include support for European and Brazilian mainframe system processing and application maintenance through June 2010, as well as workplace and service desk and voice and data network management through March 2014. There are no minimum payments required under this contract. The amounts disclosed in the table reflect our estimate of probable minimum payments for the periods shown. We can terminate the contract for convenience with six months prior notice, as defined in the contract, with no termination fee and with payment to EDS for costs incurred as of the termination date. Should we terminate the contract for convenience, we have an option to purchase the assets placed in service under the EDS contract.
(7) IM (Information Management) services: During 2009 we terminated several agreements with EDS for information management services and entered into new agreements for similar services with several providers. Services to be provided under these contracts include support for data network transport; mainframe application processing, development and support; and mid-range applications processing and support. These contracts have various terms through 2015. Some of the contracts require minimum payments and include termination penalties. The amounts disclosed in this table reflect our estimate of probable minimum payments.
Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefit Plans
We sponsor pension and other post-retirement benefit plans that may require periodic cash contributions. Our 2009 contributions for these plans were $122 million for pensions and $107 million for our retiree health plans. We expect to make contributions of approximately $260 million to our worldwide defined benefit pension plans and $103 million to our retiree health benefit plans in 2010. Once the January 1, 2010 actuarial valuations are finalized for our U.S. qualified pension plans, we will reassess the need for additional contributions for these plans. No additional contributions were made in 2009, due to the ERISA funded status of our U.S. qualified pension plans and the availability of a credit balance that had resulted from funding in prior periods in excess of minimum requirements. In 2008 we made additional contributions above what was disclosed in the 2007 Annual Report of $165 million to our U.S. qualified pension plans.
Our retiree health benefit plans are non-funded and are almost entirely related to domestic operations. Cash contributions are made each year to cover medical claims costs incurred in that year. The amounts reported in the above table as retiree health payments represent our estimated future benefit payments.
Fuji Xerox
We purchased products, including parts and supplies, from Fuji Xerox totaling $1.6 billion, $2.1 billion and $1.9 billion in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our purchase commitments with Fuji Xerox are in the normal course of business and typically have a lead time of three months. Related party transactions with Fuji Xerox are discussed in Note 7 – Investments in Affiliates, at Equity in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Brazil Tax and Labor Contingencies
Our Brazilian operations were involved in various litigation matters and have received or been the subject of numerous governmental assessments related to indirect and other taxes, as well as disputes associated with former employees and contract labor. The tax matters, which comprise a significant portion of the total contingencies, principally relate to claims for taxes on the internal transfer of inventory, municipal service taxes on rentals and gross revenue taxes. We are disputing these tax matters and intend to vigorously defend our position. Based on the opinion of legal counsel and current reserves for those matters deemed probable of loss, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will materially impact our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. The labor matters principally relate to claims made by former employees and contract labor for the equivalent payment of all social security and other related labor benefits, as well as consequential tax claims, as if they were regular employees. As of December 31, 2009 the total amounts related to the unreserved portion of the tax and labor contingencies, inclusive of any related interest, amounted to approximately $1,225 million, with the increase from the December 31, 2008 balance of $839 million primarily related to currency and current-year interest indexation. In connection with the above proceedings, customary local regulations may require us to make escrow cash deposits or post other security of up to half of the total amount in dispute. As of December 31, 2009 we had $240 million of escrow cash deposits for matters we are disputing, and there are liens on certain Brazilian assets with a net book value of $19 million and additional letters of credit of approximately $137 million. Generally, any escrowed amounts would be refundable and any liens would be removed to the extent the matters are resolved in our favor. We routinely assess all these matters as to probability of ultimately incurring a liability against our Brazilian operations, and record our best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where we assess the likelihood of an ultimate loss as probable.
Other Contingencies and Commitments
As more fully discussed in Note 16 – Contingencies in the Consolidated Financial Statements, we are involved in a variety of claims, lawsuits, investigations and proceedings concerning securities law, intellectual property law, environmental law, employment law and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. In addition, guarantees, indemnifications and claims may arise during the ordinary course of business from relationships with suppliers, customers and nonconsolidated affiliates. Nonperformance under a contract including a guarantee, indemnification or claim could trigger an obligation of the Company. We determine whether an estimated loss from a contingency should be accrued by assessing whether a loss is deemed probable and can be reasonably estimated. Should developments in any of these areas cause a change in our determination as to an unfavorable outcome and result in the need to recognize a material accrual, or should any of these matters result in a final adverse judgment or be settled for significant amounts, they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial position in the period or periods in which such change in determination, judgment or settlement occurs.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
As of December 31, 2009 we had $148 million of unrecognized tax benefits. This represents the tax benefits associated with various tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, on domestic and international tax returns that have not been recognized in our financial statements due to uncertainty regarding their resolution. The resolution or settlement of these tax positions with the taxing authorities is at various stages and therefore we are unable to make a reliable estimate of the eventual cash flows by period that may be required to settle these matters. In addition, certain of these matters may not require cash settlement due to the existence of credit and net operating loss carryforwards, as well as other offsets, including the indirect benefit from other taxing jurisdictions that may be available.
